Archive for April, 2008

Talk about your bad timing: Hillary required to testify in November

Tuesday, April 29th, 2008

From the Talking Points Memo:

In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in a sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!

While Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Al Gore, Ed Rendell, Barabara Streisand, Cher, Stan Lee, Brad Pitt, Mike Wallace, Larry King et al may be called to testify and be deposed starting in May, Hillary alone has been protected from explaining her role in her husband’s fraud charges.

Obama Maybe Mispoke About Mistaken Aid’s Misrepresentation

Friday, April 25th, 2008

Did he or didn’t he fill out the questionnaire is the question from Politico.com:

During his first run for elected office, Barack Obama played a greater role than his aides now acknowledge in crafting liberal stands on gun control, the death penalty and abortion — positions that appear at odds with the more moderate image he has projected during his presidential campaign.

The evidence comes from an amended version of an Illinois voter group’s detailed questionnaire, filed under his name during his 1996 bid for a state Senate seat.

Late last year, in response to a Politico story about Obama’s answers to the original questionnaire , his aides said he “never saw or approved” the questionnaire.

They asserted the responses were filled out by a campaign aide who “unintentionally mischaracterize[d] his position.”

I’m starting to see a dangerous trend from the good Senator. Fox News needs to ditch the “Obama Watch” counter they’ve been running and add an “aid blame” counter. How many times has he blamed a lack of knowledge of what’s going on in his campaign for a misstep or mistake? If he can’t keep up with what’s happening in his campaign, can he be expected to keep up with the world once he holds the most powerful job on the planet? Would Hillary get away with replying to a hard question with, “Gee, I don’t know. One of my aids must have done that.”

I think we all know the answer to that.

Reverse-psychology works every time. Or does it?

Thursday, April 24th, 2008

Mike Gallagher only wanted you to believe he predicted an Obama win on Tuesday:

You may recall that I predicted an Obama victory yesterday in Pennsylvania. Naturally, I didn’t believe he would win. But I wanted to trick Democrats in Pennsylvania into thinking that I did. I wanted to send them into the voting booths and vote for Hillary just to prove me wrong.

Sigh. Not a whole lot to say about this, but it does strike me as a bit childish to pull this "I just wanted you to think that’s what I was thinking" stuff at this point in the game. In the world of talking heads we live in, it’s not too much to ask that you simply admit when you’re wrong. It’ll be forgotten the next day anyway.

Powerful video

Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008

Great questions…why can’t we vote? Call your representative. If you’re in the Fightin’ 33rd here in Tennessee like me your rep is Jim Hackworth: rep.jim.hackworth@legislature.state.tn.us, (865) 482-2455.

Abortion Art Not a Hoax

Saturday, April 19th, 2008

Of course I don’t expect that news outlets are going to go back and redact their redaction, but here’s the truth from Yale’s new artistic treasure, Aliza Shvarts:

According to a statement released by the University today, Aliza Shvarts ’08 was never impregnated. She never miscarried. The sweeping outrage on blogs across the country was apparently for naught.

The supposed senior art project of the Davenport College senior was a “creative fiction,” a Yale official said Thursday afternoon as students on campus and bloggers across the country expressed colossal outrage over what Shvarts described as a documentation of a nine-month process during which she claimed to have artificially inseminated herself “as often as possible” while periodically taking “abortifacient drugs” to induce miscarriages.

“The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman’s body,” Yale spokeswoman Helaine Klasky said in a written statement e-mailed to the News this afternoon.

But Shvarts stood by her project, calling the University’s statement “ultimately inaccurate.”

Click here to read the rest.

Can’t ask, so don’t tell: Updated

Friday, April 4th, 2008

Various news outlets this morning are reporting on San Fran’s 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling that Roommates.com can’t ask if you’re straight or gay when you fill out their profile page on the site:

To inquire electronically about sexual orientation would not be different from asking people in person or by telephone if they were black or Jewish before conducting business, the panel said in an 8-3 ruling that partly overturns a lower federal court decision.

“If such screening is prohibited when practiced in person or by telephone, we see no reason why Congress would have wanted to make it lawful to profit from it online,” 9th Circuit chief judge Alex Kozinski wrote. “Not only does Roommate ask these questions, Roommate makes answering the discriminatory questions a condition of doing business.”

Since when did “homosexual” become a race? Have homosexuals, on the whole, ever been denied the right to vote? Have they been forced to the back of the bus? Do suicide bombers attack them in the market place? Did Hitler exterminate 6 million of them?

Secondly, some liberals are so racist and bigoted that they can’t see straight (no pun intended). They say that homosexuality is no big deal, but then absolutely freak out—we’re talking take it through the courts freak out—when someone asks if they’re homosexual.

What I mean is that homosexuals will often say that they’re proud — they’ll go to a gay pride event, they’ll hang a multi-color lei from rear view mirror, etc — but when you ask them outright their orientation they suddenly become angry and view it as discrimination.

I don’t think it’s an unfair question to ask if your potential roommate may or may not be attracted to your gender. You can ask male and female, and this pertinent question exists because of sex. It is called your “sex” after all. In simpler times I would know it was inappropriate, as a man, to consider a woman as a roommate for sexual reasons. Today, that’s simply not enough information to make the decision. Is it unreasonable to want to know this? Is it any more discriminatory than asking your gender these days?

I’m expanding on this because I received a call from a friend of mine who was confused by the tone of the message, so let me say two things: 1.) ALL liberals are not anything, any more than ALL conservatives are anything. I don’t want to insinuate that all liberals are racist bigots just as I don’t want anyone to insinuate that all conservatives are racist bigots, and I don’t want to fall into the name-calling trap that many of my conservative friends do; 2.) I’m not ant-homosexual. I think homosexuality is a sin, but I also think fornication, envy, and drunkenness are sins, too. I’m not rejecting the person or that person’s rights as defined by the laws of this country. What I DO reject is special consideration and special treatment and special laws.

The bottom line for me is that giving homosexuality the same protection and classification as race is a consideration that isn’t merited by the evidence.

Watch Your Back, Woodson

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

080807_woodson.jpg

Look’s like Sen. Woodson has some competition this year:

Republican state Sen. Jamie Woodson will have no opponent in the GOP primary for re-election to her 6th District seat, but she will face a Democrat, Gary Farmer, in the November general election, based on petitions filed with the Knox County Election Commission by today’s noon deadline.

If a Democrat fills her seat he might support expansion of Pre-K programs, engage in progressive causes, grant millions of tax-payer dollars to PBS, spend tax surpluses on foreign-language school expansions, rehash failing funding formulas like BEP 2.0 to benefit pet projects, give per-gallon tax subsidies to oil companies, and introduce legislation that limits the free speech of bloggers.

Hopefully Woodson will win so we’ll have a Republican who will support expansion of Pre-K programs, engage in progressive causes, grant millions of tax-payer dollars to PBS, spend tax surpluses on foreign-language school expansions, rehash failing funding formulas like BEP 2.0 to benefit pet projects, give per-gallon tax subsidies to oil companies, and introduce legislation that limits the free speech of bloggers.

My fingers are crossed for you, Senator.

About this site

This is the personal blog of Wes Comer, a graphic designer, youth pastor, and husband of one, father of three. Here I'll share my thoughts and opinions, weighed against Truth that will hopefully help shape your world view. Most articles on this site are related to national politics, Tennessee state politics, and religion. More

Want to subscribe?

 Subscribe in a reader Or, subscribe via email:
Enter your email address:  
Find entries :