Archive for the ‘2008 Presidential Race’ Category

A stretch, at best

Monday, May 19th, 2008 |

From the Atlanta Journal Constitution:

Columbus — Georgia Republican Party chairwoman Sue Everhart said Saturday that the party’s presumed presidential nominee has a lot in common with Jesus Christ.

“John McCain is kind of like Jesus Christ on the cross,” Everhart said as she began the second day of the state GOP convention. “He never denounced God, either.”

Everhart was praising McCain for never denouncing the United States while he was being tortured as a prisoner of war in Vietnam.

“I’m not trying to compare John McCain to Jesus Christ, I’m looking at the pain that was there,” she said.

McCain might have his better points, but I don’t think this is an appropriate correlation to draw at all. While I’m sure that he endured far more than most of us ever will, I still don’t think it was comparable to what Jesus endured for you and for me.

All this statement does is serve to show that Republicans will do everything they can to manipulate the religious vote based on even the flimsiest of analogy and allegory. Republican voters, and certainly evangelical voters, deserve better than this.

Talk about your bad timing: Hillary required to testify in November

Tuesday, April 29th, 2008 |

From the Talking Points Memo:

In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in a sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!

While Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Al Gore, Ed Rendell, Barabara Streisand, Cher, Stan Lee, Brad Pitt, Mike Wallace, Larry King et al may be called to testify and be deposed starting in May, Hillary alone has been protected from explaining her role in her husband’s fraud charges.

Obama Maybe Mispoke About Mistaken Aid’s Misrepresentation

Friday, April 25th, 2008 |

Did he or didn’t he fill out the questionnaire is the question from Politico.com:

During his first run for elected office, Barack Obama played a greater role than his aides now acknowledge in crafting liberal stands on gun control, the death penalty and abortion — positions that appear at odds with the more moderate image he has projected during his presidential campaign.

The evidence comes from an amended version of an Illinois voter group’s detailed questionnaire, filed under his name during his 1996 bid for a state Senate seat.

Late last year, in response to a Politico story about Obama’s answers to the original questionnaire , his aides said he “never saw or approved” the questionnaire.

They asserted the responses were filled out by a campaign aide who “unintentionally mischaracterize[d] his position.”

I’m starting to see a dangerous trend from the good Senator. Fox News needs to ditch the “Obama Watch” counter they’ve been running and add an “aid blame” counter. How many times has he blamed a lack of knowledge of what’s going on in his campaign for a misstep or mistake? If he can’t keep up with what’s happening in his campaign, can he be expected to keep up with the world once he holds the most powerful job on the planet? Would Hillary get away with replying to a hard question with, “Gee, I don’t know. One of my aids must have done that.”

I think we all know the answer to that.

New Comic: Vast Wright-Wing Consipiracy

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008 |

preview.jpgThis makes two comics in two weeks! I’m feelin’ mighty proud. Hop on over to the web comic and check out the newest Stranger than Fiction offering tackling Sen. Obama’s speech yesterday regarding race relations.

Rush makes a good point…

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008 |

“…if anyone needs a lecture on race relations it’s the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, not the American people.”

My Pastor

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008 |

From Obama’s speech:

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely – just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

Actually, Senator — no. My pastor loves his country, prays for its leadership and preservation, and served in the U.S. military during Vietnam. He has never called for God’s damnation to fall on the country. He has never called any president, Republican or Democrat, a “C student sitting the White House”. He votes. He encourages his congregation to get involved in the process, regardless of party affiliation … I could go on, but I digress.

If you want to make excuses for your pastor, that’s fine, Senator. Just don’t drag mine down in the process.

Obama Speech: First Thoughts

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008 |

If this is how he deals with a single topic, can you imagine how long his State of the Union speeches are going to be?

Zzzzz….

Let’s Talk About Obama’s Christianity: Part 1

Friday, March 14th, 2008 |

030708_obama.jpg

Earlier this week much was made about Hillary Clinton claiming to have felt the “presence of the Holy Spirit” thanks to a link on the front page of Drudge. I would urge those who scoff and mock to remember Mr. Obama’s June 2006 speech to Call to Renewal’s Building a Covenant for a New America conference. In the speech he talks about his “conversion” experience (not insinuating anything there… non-believer converting to believer is all I’m saying):

But kneeling beneath that cross on the South Side, I felt that I heard God’s spirit beckoning me. I submitted myself to His will, and dedicated myself to discovering His truth.

The talking heads have made Hillary sound crazy for claiming to have felt the presence of God, but I must tell you that as a Christian I have absolutely no doubt. Hillary, as wrong as she is on so many issues, is still human and has that “measure of faith” that we’re all given by our Creator. He is real, His Spirit is real, and His presence can certainly be felt — just as Mr. Obama claims to have felt it. I sincerely hope that Hillary not only feels it, but will someday allow herself to be led by it.

That’s issue number one.

Reading the speech I just mentioned in its entirety, however, raised a second issue. How Mr. Obama feels about literalists — those of us who believe that the Word of God isn’t just allegory and hyperbole, but rather that we were created by God, that Noah built an ark, and that Moses parted the Red Sea.

In speaking about the contest in 2004 against Alan Keyes for the U.S. Senate seat he now inhabits Obama discusses a claim that Keyes made that Jesus would not vote for Obama. He talks about how he was given advice to let it go and forget about it, but that he wanted to respond more harshly:

But what they didn’t understand, however, was that I had to take Mr. Keyes seriously, for he claimed to speak for my religion, and my God. He claimed knowledge of certain truths.

Mr. Obama says he’s a Christian, he was saying, and yet he supports a lifestyle that the Bible calls an abomination.

Mr. Obama says he’s a Christian, but supports the destruction of innocent and sacred life.

And so what would my supporters have me say? How should I respond? Should I say that a literalist reading of the Bible was folly? Should I say that Mr. Keyes, who is a Roman Catholic, should ignore the teachings of the Pope?

Unwilling to go there, I answered with what has come to be the typically liberal response in such debates - namely, I said that we live in a pluralistic society, that I can’t impose my own religious views on another, that I was running to be the U.S. Senator of Illinois and not the Minister of Illinois.

I must say that on first reading it doesn’t seem like much, but when you realize that he’s confessing how he felt was the truthful and more intuitive way for him to respond, there’s reason for pause. Can it be that Mr. Obama feels that a literalist reading of the Bible is folly? That the Pope, whose teachings he referenced in the same breath, should be ignored? I can’t say for certain, but it looks that way to me.

I know his next words are “unwilling to go there” but that doesn’t mean that he didn’t believe it. It simply means that he wasn’t willing to make a mistake that could hurt his Senate chances.

Mr. Obama may call himself a Christian, but if you listen to his words — all of them — you quickly gain the sense that he certainly isn’t a Christian that is committed to full Biblical Truth. He believes, and has even intimated this, that he is able to pick and choose what parts of the Bible to believe, and that his faith is enough to make him a Christian. Allow me to set the record straight — faith alone does not make you Christian. You must act on that faith in a way that is in line with Biblical truth. Mr. Obama says he believes in Jesus, but it’s important to note that belief doesn’t make him a Christian, either. That’s right— I said that if you believe in Jesus that isn’t enough to save you or to make you a Christian:

“What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?… Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone… Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble. But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?…Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only… For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.” (James 2)

More shortly…

Believe it or not… a new comic

Tuesday, March 11th, 2008 |

I just posted a new Stranger than Fiction comic — the first in nearly 10 months. 10 months. I couldn’t believe that number was right at first but looking at the last post with its oh-so out of date reference to Giuliani as the GOP front runner I was forced to admit that I’ve been woefully neglectful of the comic. So go check it out post-haste.

Your Hypocrisy is Showing: Howard Dean Edition

Thursday, March 6th, 2008 |

[kml_flashembed movie=”http://youtube.com/v/KDwODbl3muE” class=”center” width=”425″ height=”350″ wmode=”transparent” /]

From the Democrat Party’s website regarding their agenda item of Election Reform:

A fundamental tenet of our democracy is the right to vote and have that vote counted. We must be vigilant in protecting this right and ensuring that our voting system is fair for every American.

Yet, this morning Mr. I Have a Scream sang a different song when asked about a request from Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) for the DNC to pay for a new election to be held in his state:

“We can’t afford to do that,” Dean stated on CBS’s “Early Show.” “That’s not our problem. We need our money to win the presidential race.”

Whoah, there Howie — not your problem? YOU are the one who made the decision to disenfranchise the 2.5 million Democratic voters in Florida and Michigan. I’m pretty sure that makes this problem ALL yours.

Obama’s Agenda Taking Form

Thursday, February 28th, 2008 |

Leading homosexual magazine The Advocate is reporting that Obama is looking to win more broad based support among liberals with concentrated ad buys in Ohio and Texas’ Lesbian, Gay, Bi, and Transgender communities. A draft copy of one of his new LGBT ads appears below, along with the full text of a letter on its way from the Obama camp entitled “Open Letter from Barack Obama to the LGBT community” in which he (Warning: outside links are for websites that may feature offensive images.):

obama_lgbt_1.jpg

“Open Letter from Barack Obama to the LGBT community:

I’m running for President to build an America that lives up to our founding promise of equality for all – a promise that extends to our gay brothers and sisters. It’s wrong to have millions of Americans living as second-class citizens in this nation. And I ask for your support in this election so that together we can bring about real change for all LGBT Americans.

Equality is a moral imperative. That’s why throughout my career, I have fought to eliminate discrimination against LGBT Americans. In Illinois, I co-sponsored a fully inclusive bill that prohibited discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity, extending protection to the workplace, housing, and places of public accommodation. In the U.S. Senate, I have co-sponsored bills that would equalize tax treatment for same-sex couples and provide benefits to domestic partners of federal employees. And as president, I will place the weight of my administration behind the enactment of the Matthew Shepard Act to outlaw hate crimes and a fully inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act to outlaw workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

As your President, I will use the bully pulpit to urge states to treat same-sex couples with full equality in their family and adoption laws. I personally believe that civil unions represent the best way to secure that equal treatment. But I also believe that the federal government should not stand in the way of states that want to decide on their own how best to pursue equality for gay and lesbian couples — whether that means a domestic partnership, a civil union, or a civil marriage. Unlike Senator Clinton, I support the complete repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) – a position I have held since before arriving in the U.S. Senate. While some say we should repeal only part of the law, I believe we should get rid of that statute altogether. Federal law should not discriminate in any way against gay and lesbian couples, which is precisely what DOMA does. I have also called for us to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and I have worked to improve the Uniting American Families Act so we can afford same-sex couples the same rights and obligations as married couples in our immigration system.

The next president must also address the HIV/AIDS epidemic. When it comes to prevention, we do not have to choose between values and science. While abstinence education should be part of any strategy, we also need to use common sense. We should have age-appropriate sex education that includes information about contraception. We should pass the JUSTICE Act to combat infection within our prison population. And we should lift the federal ban on needle exchange, which could dramatically reduce rates of infection among drug users. In addition, local governments can protect public health by distributing contraceptives.

We also need a president who’s willing to confront the stigma – too often tied to homophobia – that continues to surround HIV/AIDS. I confronted this stigma directly in a speech to evangelicals at Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church, and will continue to speak out as president. That is where I stand on the major issues of the day. But having the right positions on the issues is only half the battle. The other half is to win broad support for those positions. And winning broad support will require stepping outside our comfort zone. If we want to repeal DOMA, repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and implement fully inclusive laws outlawing hate crimes and discrimination in the workplace, we need to bring the message of LGBT equality to skeptical audiences as well as friendly ones – and that’s what I’ve done throughout my career. I brought this message of inclusiveness to all of America in my keynote address at the 2004 Democratic convention. I talked about the need to fight homophobia when I announced my candidacy for President, and I have been talking about LGBT equality to a number of groups during this campaign – from local LGBT activists to rural farmers to parishioners at Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, where Dr. Martin Luther King once preached.

Just as important, I have been listening to what all Americans have to say. I will never compromise on my commitment to equal rights for all LGBT Americans. But neither will I close my ears to the voices of those who still need to be convinced. That is the work we must do to move forward together. It is difficult. It is challenging. And it is necessary.

Americans are yearning for leadership that can empower us to reach for what we know is possible. I believe that we can achieve the goal of full equality for the millions of LGBT people in this country. To do that, we need leadership that can appeal to the best parts of the human spirit. Join with me, and I will provide that leadership. Together, we will achieve real equality for all Americans, gay and straight alike.”

More to follow…

Beware the Obama

Thursday, February 14th, 2008 |

There’s a lot of talk suddenly about the Democratic superdelegates issue with Obama sweeping into the lead. NPR reports on Donna Brazile’s position:

Democratic strategist Donna Brazile — who managed Al Gore’s 2000 presidential campaign and is herself a superdelegate — says she will quit her position within the Democratic Party if her superdelegate colleagues decide the party’s nomination.

“Let’s wait for some of these other states to help sort this out,” Brazile, a News & Notes contributor, told Farai Chideya.

And now Al Sharpton weighs in (imagine that) on seating delegates from Florida and Michigan:

“I write this letter as a former Democratic candidate for President of the United States and a civil rights leader who has fought his entire life for fairness and justice for all people regardless of the color of their skin. I firmly believe that changing the rules now, and seating delegates from Florida and Michigan at this point would not only violate the Democratic party’s rules of fairness, but also would be a grave injustice.”

He also adds, in a sentence that should probably get its own post, that he is “a civil rights leader who is neutral in this presidential primary season“.

But the question here isn’t why does Hillary want the delegates seated and the superdelegates for her — that much is obvious. The real question is why wouldn’t Obama want that? Let’s be honest here. What we’re talking about with this issue of Florida and Michigan is the public disenfranchisement of nearly 2.5 million Democratic voters. The DNC can talk about fairness and punishment all they want, but they’re not punishing the state parties responsible for the decision, they’re punishing the citizenry of those states that had absolutely no control over the process.

021308_vote.jpgWe’re talking about 180 delegates for Clinton. That’s the only reason Obama doesn’t want them seated. It has nothing to do with fairness and everyone knows it. If Clinton were smart, she would start pounding Sharpton, Brazile, and the entire DNC with their own quotes regarding disenfranchisement from the 2000 and 2004 elections. If the people of Florida and Michigan were smart, they would sue the DNC for blocking their vote. This would be useless, since there is no national right to vote (believe it or not), but would do such damage to the DNC as a party of the people that they would quickly settle the issue.

Frankly, Hillary Clinton, the Florida and Michigan voters, John McCain, and the rest of us shouldn’t be so afraid of being called racist that we allow ourselves to be bullied by hypocrites.

Two last points for all of you who are yelling “DON’T LET THEM BE SEATED! There was an AGREEMENT!” First, the agreement should have never been made — it isn’t right by any standard or for any reason to disenfranchise voters. Second, and final, you assume when you say that there was an agreement that you were privy to all the backroom discussion and dealing that goes with that type of arrangement. Who knows what winks and nods were exchanged. Frankly, if those states went for Obama this wouldn’t even be a discussion. They’d be calling him a hero for rescuing the disenfranchised, huddled masses.

I say beware a man who doesn’t blink at taping shut the mouths of 2.5 million.

Boo to Fox News…

Saturday, February 9th, 2008 |

…who refused to carry Mike Huckabee’s full CPAC speech in favor of a fluff piece on bullying. I understand that he has a slim chance of winning the nomination at this point, but he certainly is still a big part of how things shape up for conservatives in the coming days. I still feel that it’s extremely important to hear what he has to say. Especially considering that they’ve carried every other speech in its entirety this week.

Boo. Hiss.

Dobson Endorses…

Friday, February 8th, 2008 |

020808_dobson.jpgMaybe I’ve just missed it. Maybe all the fanfare that normally goes along with an endorsement by a “Kingmaker” slipped past me. But I’m not seeing it anywhere. A cursory perusal of the major news sites has no headlining information (I found this information on WSJ and Fox Blogs) on Dr. James Dobson’s endorsement late last night of Gov. Mike Huckabee:

Dr. James Dobson issues the following statement tonight, speaking as a private citizen.”I am endorsing Gov. Mike Huckabee for President of the United States today. My decision comes in the wake of my statement on Super Tuesday that I could not vote for Sen. John McCain, even if he goes on to win the Republican nomination. His record on the institution of the family and other conservative issues makes his candidacy a matter of conscience and concern for me. That left two pro-family candidates whom I could support, but I was reluctant to choose between them. However, the decision by Gov. Mitt Romney to put his campaign “on hold” changes the political landscape. The remaining candidate for whom I could vote is Gov. Huckabee. His unwavering positions on the social issues, notably the institution of marriage, the importance of faith and the sanctity of human life, resonate deeply with me and with many others. That is why I will support Gov. Huckabee through the remaining primaries, and will vote for him in the general election if he should get the nomination. Obviously, the governor faces an uphill struggle, given the delegates already committed to Sen. McCain. Nevertheless, I believe he is our best remaining choice for President of the United States.

Is it too little too late? Probably. And this is what kills me about this. I mean, two weeks ago did anyone really see any different outcome? Not me, and I know that Dobson and others are far more intelligent than I on these matters. So why hold off on giving an endorsement that actually could have made a bigger difference if given before Super Tuesday?

At any rate, there it is. Dobson endorses Huckabee saying that if McCain receives the nomination that he will, for the first time in his life, not cast a vote for President.

Full Text of Romney’s CPAC Speech

Thursday, February 7th, 2008 |

020708_romney.jpg

Where was this version of Mitt Romney two months ago? Or even two days ago? He said more in this one speech to convince me to vote for him than every other appearance he’s ever made combined. Here, in its entirety is his speech from CPAC just a few hours ago:

“I want to begin by saying thank you. It’s great to be with you again. And I look forward to joining with you many more times in the future.

“Last year, CPAC gave me the sendoff I needed. I was in single digits in the polls, and I was facing household Republican names. As of today, more than 4 million people have given me their vote for President, less than Senator McCain’s 4.7 million, but quite a statement nonetheless. Eleven states have given me their nod, compared to his 13. Of course, because size does matter, he’s doing quite a bit better with his number of delegates.

“To all of you, thank you for caring enough about the future of America to show up, stand up and speak up for conservative principles.

“As I said to you last year, conservative principles are needed now more than ever. We face a new generation of challenges, challenges which threaten our prosperity, our security and our future. I am convinced that unless America changes course, we will become the France of the 21st century – still a great nation, but no longer the leader of the world, no longer the superpower. And to me, that is unthinkable. Simon Peres, in a visit to Boston, was asked what he thought about the war in Iraq. ‘First,’ he said, ‘I must put something in context. America is unique in the history of the world. In the history of the world, whenever there has been conflict, the nation that wins takes land from the nation that loses. One nation in history, and this during the last century, laid down hundreds of thousands of lives and took no land. No land from Germany, no land from Japan, no land from Korea. America is unique in the sacrifice it has made for liberty, for itself and for freedom loving people around the world.’ The best ally peace has ever known, and will ever know, is a strong America.

“And that is why we must rise to the occasion, as we have always done before, to confront the challenges ahead. Perhaps the most fundamental of these is the attack on the American culture.

“Over the years, my business has taken me to many countries. I have been struck by the enormous differences in the wealth and well-being of people of different nations. I have read a number of scholarly explanations for the disparities. I found the most convincing was that written by David Landes, a professor emeritus from Harvard University. I presume he’s a liberal – I guess that’s redundant. His work traces the coming and going of great civilizations throughout history. After hundreds of pages of analysis, he concludes with this:

“If we learn anything from the history of economic development, it is that culture makes all the difference. Culture makes all the difference.

“What is it about American culture that has led us to become the most powerful nation in the history of the world? We believe in hard work and education. We love opportunity: almost all of us are immigrants or descendants of immigrants who came here for opportunity – opportunity is in our DNA. Americans love God, and those who don’t have faith, typically believe in something greater than themselves – a ‘Purpose Driven Life.’ And we sacrifice everything we have, even our lives, for our families, our freedoms and our country. The values and beliefs of the free American people are the source of our nation’s strength and they always will be.

“The threat to our culture comes from within. The 1960’s welfare programs created a culture of poverty. Some think we won that battle when we reformed welfare, but the liberals haven’t given up. At every turn, they try to substitute government largesse for individual responsibility. They fight to strip work requirements from welfare, to put more people on Medicaid, and to remove more and more people from having to pay any income tax whatsoever. Dependency is death to initiative, risk-taking and opportunity. Dependency is a culture-killing drug. We have got to fight it like the poison it is.

“The attack on faith and religion is no less relentless. And tolerance for pornography – even celebration of it – and sexual promiscuity, combined with the twisted incentives of government welfare programs have led to today’s grim realities: 68% of African American children are born out-of-wedlock, 45% of Hispanic children, and 25% of White children. How much harder it is for these children to succeed in school and in life. A nation built on the principles of the Founding Fathers cannot long stand when its children are raised without fathers in the home.

“The development of a child is enhanced by having a mother and father. Such a family is the ideal for the future of the child and for the strength of a nation. I wonder how it is that unelected judges, like some in my state of Massachusetts, are so unaware of this reality, so oblivious to the millennia of recorded history. It is time for the people of America to fortify marriage through Constitutional amendment, so that liberal judges cannot continue to attack it.

“Europe is facing a demographic disaster. That is the inevitable product of weakened faith in the Creator, failed families, disrespect for the sanctity of human life and eroded morality. Some reason that culture is merely an accessory to America’s vitality; we know that it is the source of our strength. And we are not dissuaded by the snickers and knowing glances when we stand up for family values, and morality, and culture. We will always be honored to stand on principle and to stand for principle.

“The attack on our culture is not our sole challenge. We face economic competition unlike anything we have ever known before. China and Asia are emerging from centuries of poverty. Their people are plentiful, innovative and ambitious. If we do not change course, Asia or China will pass us by as the economic superpower, just as we passed England and France during the last century. The prosperity and security of our children and grandchildren depend on us.

“Our prosperity and security also depend on finally acting to become energy secure. Oil producing states like Russia and Venezuela, Saudi Arabia and Iran are siphoning over $400 billion per year from our economy – that’s almost what we spend annually for defense. It is past time for us to invest in energy technology, nuclear power, clean coal, liquid coal, renewable sources and energy efficiency. America must never be held hostage by the likes of Putin, Chavez, and Ahmadinejad.

“And our economy is also burdened by the inexorable ramping of government spending. Don’t focus on the pork alone – even though it is indeed irritating and shameful. Look at the entitlements. They make up 60% of federal spending today. By the end of the next President’s second term, they will total 70%. Any conservative plan for the future has to include entitlement reform that solves the problem, not just acknowledges it.

“Most politicians don’t seem to understand the connection between our ability to compete and our national wealth, and the wealth of our families. They act as if money just happens – that it’s just there. But every dollar represents a good or service produced in the private sector. Depress the private sector and you depress the well-being of Americans.

“That’s exactly what happens with high taxes, over-regulation, tort windfalls, mandates, and overfed, over-spending government. Did you see that today, government workers make more money than people who work in the private sector? Can you imagine what happens to an economy where the best opportunities are for bureaucrats?

“It’s high time to lower taxes, including corporate taxes, to take a weed-whacker to government regulations, to reform entitlements, and to stand up to the increasingly voracious appetite of the unions in our government.

“And finally, let’s consider the greatest challenge facing America – and facing the entire civilized world: the threat of violent, radical Jihad. In one wing of the world of Islam, there is a conviction that all governments should be destroyed and replaced by a religious caliphate. These Jihadists will battle any form of democracy. To them, democracy is blasphemous for it says that citizens, not God shape the law. They find the idea of human equality to be offensive. They hate everything we believe about freedom just as we hate everything they believe about radical Jihad.

“To battle this threat, we have sent the most courageous and brave soldiers in the world. But their numbers have been depleted by the Clinton years when troops were reduced by 500,000, when 80 ships were retired from the Navy, and when our human intelligence was slashed by 25%. We were told that we were getting a peace dividend. We got the dividend, but we didn’t get the peace. In the face of evil in radical Jihad and given the inevitable military ambitions of China, we must act to rebuild our military might – raise military spending to 4% of our GDP, purchase the most modern armament, re-shape our fighting forces for the asymmetric demands we now face, and give the veterans the care they deserve.

“Soon, the face of liberalism in America will have a new name. Whether it is Barack or Hillary, the result would be the same if they were to win the Presidency. The opponents of American culture would push the throttle, devising new justifications for judges to depart from the Constitution. Economic neophytes would layer heavier and heavier burdens on employers and families, slowing our economy and opening the way for foreign competition to further erode our lead.

“Even though we face an uphill fight, I know that many in this room are fully behind my campaign. You are with me all the way to the convention. Fight on, just like Ronald Reagan did in 1976. But there is an important difference from 1976: today, we are a nation at war.

“And Barack and Hillary have made their intentions clear regarding Iraq and the war on terror. They would retreat and declare defeat. And the consequence of that would be devastating. It would mean attacks on America, launched from safe havens that make Afghanistan under the Taliban look like child’s play. About this, I have no doubt.

“I disagree with Senator McCain on a number of issues, as you know. But I agree with him on doing whatever it takes to be successful in Iraq, on finding and executing Osama bin Laden, and on eliminating Al Qaeda and terror. If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.

“This is not an easy decision for me. I hate to lose. My family, my friends and our supporters – many of you right here in this room – have given a great deal to get me where I have a shot at becoming President. If this were only about me, I would go on. But I entered this race because I love America, and because I love America, I feel I must now stand aside, for our party and for our country.

“I will continue to stand for conservative principles. I will fight alongside you for all the things we believe in. And one of those things is that we cannot allow the next President of the United States to retreat in the face evil extremism.

“It is the common task of each generation – and the burden of liberty – to preserve this country, expand its freedoms and renew its spirit so that its noble past is prologue to its glorious future.

“To this task, accepting this burden, we are all dedicated, and I firmly believe, by the providence of the Almighty, that we will succeed beyond our fondest hope. America must remain, as it has always been, the hope of the Earth.

“Thank you, and God bless America.”

About this site

This is the personal blog of Wes Comer, a graphic designer, youth pastor, and husband of one, father of three. Here I'll share my thoughts and opinions, weighed against Truth that will hopefully help shape your world view. Most articles on this site are related to national politics, Tennessee state politics, and religion. More

Want to subscribe?

 Subscribe in a reader Or, subscribe via email:
Enter your email address:  
Find entries :