Smells Like an Election Year

Written on March 11, 2008 – 4:48 pm | Posted by Wes Comer |

From KnoxNews.com:

NASHVILLE - A proposal to make it a crime for illegal immigrants to accept pay for work done in Tennessee is headed for floor votes in both chambers of the General Assembly.

The Senate Commerce Committee voted unanimously today to advance the proposal to make it a misdemeanor for illegal immigrants to accept pay.

The measure sponsored by Sen. Joe Haynes, a Goodlettsville Democrat, could lead to fines of $500, up to six months in jail and require illegal immigrants to forfeit any earnings they receive.

Haynes says the Legislature is prevented from enacting tougher penalties against employers who hire illegal immigrants because the state must defer to federal laws on the matter.

While I’m for measures to penalize illegal immigration, I think this is a moronically backwards way of doing so. Why aren’t we going after the employers? How is it even feasible to enforce this (”I can’t ask if you’re here illegally, and I’m not profiling, but hypothetically if you were here illegally, have you been working and getting paid? Because if you have I need to give you a fine. No? Okay. Here’s a driver’s license and a voter registration card — sorry to have troubled you.”)?

How is it that lawmakers are getting paid to come up with junk like this? My six year old son could draft a better document.

Sigh. I digress. Here’s why it’s stupid: Haynes says that the state has to defer to federal laws on employers. I call bull-feces.

Tennessee regulates labor and workforce on a state level, as evidenced by the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce. That’s right — an entire department devoted to enforcing Tennessee State Labor Laws. But Mr. Haynes says they can’t do anything about employers. Their hands are tied, poor kids. They’d like to be able to regulate the workforce, they just can’t.

This is just a sad, sad attempt by state Democrats to make themselves look more conservative before November. There are a number of bills being introduced this year for that exact purpose (my own representative, Jim Hackworth, has his name attached to an “interesting” abortion bill). However, those bills don’t stand up to close scrutiny by the informed.

Fortunately for the Dems people don’t seem very interested in being informed this election cycle. They prefer to be inspired.

Your Hypocrisy is Showing: Howard Dean Edition

Written on March 6, 2008 – 4:19 pm | Posted by Wes Comer |

[kml_flashembed movie=”http://youtube.com/v/KDwODbl3muE” class=”center” width=”425″ height=”350″ wmode=”transparent” /]

From the Democrat Party’s website regarding their agenda item of Election Reform:

A fundamental tenet of our democracy is the right to vote and have that vote counted. We must be vigilant in protecting this right and ensuring that our voting system is fair for every American.

Yet, this morning Mr. I Have a Scream sang a different song when asked about a request from Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) for the DNC to pay for a new election to be held in his state:

“We can’t afford to do that,” Dean stated on CBS’s “Early Show.” “That’s not our problem. We need our money to win the presidential race.”

Whoah, there Howie — not your problem? YOU are the one who made the decision to disenfranchise the 2.5 million Democratic voters in Florida and Michigan. I’m pretty sure that makes this problem ALL yours.

Obama’s Agenda Taking Form

Written on February 28, 2008 – 7:23 pm | Posted by Wes Comer |

Leading homosexual magazine The Advocate is reporting that Obama is looking to win more broad based support among liberals with concentrated ad buys in Ohio and Texas’ Lesbian, Gay, Bi, and Transgender communities. A draft copy of one of his new LGBT ads appears below, along with the full text of a letter on its way from the Obama camp entitled “Open Letter from Barack Obama to the LGBT community” in which he (Warning: outside links are for websites that may feature offensive images.):

obama_lgbt_1.jpg

“Open Letter from Barack Obama to the LGBT community:

I’m running for President to build an America that lives up to our founding promise of equality for all – a promise that extends to our gay brothers and sisters. It’s wrong to have millions of Americans living as second-class citizens in this nation. And I ask for your support in this election so that together we can bring about real change for all LGBT Americans.

Equality is a moral imperative. That’s why throughout my career, I have fought to eliminate discrimination against LGBT Americans. In Illinois, I co-sponsored a fully inclusive bill that prohibited discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity, extending protection to the workplace, housing, and places of public accommodation. In the U.S. Senate, I have co-sponsored bills that would equalize tax treatment for same-sex couples and provide benefits to domestic partners of federal employees. And as president, I will place the weight of my administration behind the enactment of the Matthew Shepard Act to outlaw hate crimes and a fully inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act to outlaw workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

As your President, I will use the bully pulpit to urge states to treat same-sex couples with full equality in their family and adoption laws. I personally believe that civil unions represent the best way to secure that equal treatment. But I also believe that the federal government should not stand in the way of states that want to decide on their own how best to pursue equality for gay and lesbian couples — whether that means a domestic partnership, a civil union, or a civil marriage. Unlike Senator Clinton, I support the complete repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) – a position I have held since before arriving in the U.S. Senate. While some say we should repeal only part of the law, I believe we should get rid of that statute altogether. Federal law should not discriminate in any way against gay and lesbian couples, which is precisely what DOMA does. I have also called for us to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and I have worked to improve the Uniting American Families Act so we can afford same-sex couples the same rights and obligations as married couples in our immigration system.

The next president must also address the HIV/AIDS epidemic. When it comes to prevention, we do not have to choose between values and science. While abstinence education should be part of any strategy, we also need to use common sense. We should have age-appropriate sex education that includes information about contraception. We should pass the JUSTICE Act to combat infection within our prison population. And we should lift the federal ban on needle exchange, which could dramatically reduce rates of infection among drug users. In addition, local governments can protect public health by distributing contraceptives.

We also need a president who’s willing to confront the stigma – too often tied to homophobia – that continues to surround HIV/AIDS. I confronted this stigma directly in a speech to evangelicals at Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church, and will continue to speak out as president. That is where I stand on the major issues of the day. But having the right positions on the issues is only half the battle. The other half is to win broad support for those positions. And winning broad support will require stepping outside our comfort zone. If we want to repeal DOMA, repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and implement fully inclusive laws outlawing hate crimes and discrimination in the workplace, we need to bring the message of LGBT equality to skeptical audiences as well as friendly ones – and that’s what I’ve done throughout my career. I brought this message of inclusiveness to all of America in my keynote address at the 2004 Democratic convention. I talked about the need to fight homophobia when I announced my candidacy for President, and I have been talking about LGBT equality to a number of groups during this campaign – from local LGBT activists to rural farmers to parishioners at Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, where Dr. Martin Luther King once preached.

Just as important, I have been listening to what all Americans have to say. I will never compromise on my commitment to equal rights for all LGBT Americans. But neither will I close my ears to the voices of those who still need to be convinced. That is the work we must do to move forward together. It is difficult. It is challenging. And it is necessary.

Americans are yearning for leadership that can empower us to reach for what we know is possible. I believe that we can achieve the goal of full equality for the millions of LGBT people in this country. To do that, we need leadership that can appeal to the best parts of the human spirit. Join with me, and I will provide that leadership. Together, we will achieve real equality for all Americans, gay and straight alike.”

More to follow…

Fake Christians: Part 1

Written on February 16, 2008 – 9:58 pm | Posted by Wes Comer |

Charles Barkley says that he gets sick when he hears the word “conservative” because “they’re just fake Christians, as I call them.” Clip below:

[dailymotion x4e0qt]

This got me to thinking. Which party is the party of Biblical values? Why don’t we take a look at some important issues in this election as well as major differences between the parties and see how we dastardly Christians fare, eh?

Right to Life/Abortion

Conservatives say:

That all men are created equal, with certain inalienable rights…life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That life, as an inalienable right, is granted by God at the moment of conception and should be protected by the same government that drafted the document declaring the right of all to it.

Liberals say:

That pregnancy is not equal to life and that a fetus is a clump of cells. That women should have the right to terminate a pregnancy under the law as an issue of privacy.

The Bible says:

That life is given by God in the womb — “Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee…” Jeremiah 1:5

That taking the life of a child is spilling innocent blood — “Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils, And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood.” Psalms 106:37-38

If a life is a life in the womb according to Jeremiah, and the taking of innocent life is considered evil, I would say that this one falls to the conservative view point.

Point for Conservatism.

Welfare and Entitlement

Conservatives say:

People should work to build better lives for themselves. The Platform of the GOP claims a goal of moving welfare recipients off the rolls and into jobs. That while the government should provide assistance to those in true need that we should not create a “welfare state” where people choose to live off of the government instead of by their own hand.

Liberals say:

People are entitled to a certain level of dignity through income. If they are unable to earn the income they require the government should provide assistance for those who have a disability, lack education or job training, unskilled laborers whose jobs may have been outsourced, substance abuse or addiction issues, etc. They believe that government should support them until such time as they are ready to get back on their feet.

The Bible says:

Neither did we eat any man’s bread for nought; but wrought with labour and travail night and day, that we might not be chargeable to any of you: Not because we have not power, but to make ourselves an ensample unto you to follow us. For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat. For we hear that there are some which walk among you disorderly, working not at all, but are busybodies. Now them that are such we command and exhort by our Lord Jesus Christ, that with quietness they work, and eat their own bread. ” (2 Thessalonians 3:8-12)

But what about those who can’t take care of themselves? Doesn’t the Bible say that we should help those who can’t help themselves? Actually, the Bible says that family should first take care of their needy:

But if any widow have children or nephews, let them learn first to shew piety at home, and to requite their parents: for that is good and acceptable before God.” (1 Timothy 5:4)

What about those without family? The Bible, in that instance, calls upon the church to care for “true widows”:

Honour widows that are widows indeed.” (1 Timothy 5:1)

However, the Word is careful to remind us that family should take the charge first, and the chapter outlines certain restriction of who qualifies as a “widow indeed”. (A widow indeed is supposed to be over 60, never divorced, well reported, raising her children and doing good works…)

If any man or woman that believeth have widows, let them relieve them, and let not the church be charged; that it may relieve them that are widows indeed.” (1 Timothy 5:16)

Perhaps one of the most intersting accounts of government involvement with the poor is found in Ezekiel:

Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.” (Ezekiel 16:49-50)

So the Bible actually counts not strengthening the hand of the poor and needy, or assisting them in ways that allow them to provide for themselves (their “hand”) as “iniquity” or sin.

While this one is hard to judge, and I truly believe that many liberals want to provide for the poor for good reasons and because they genuinely feel for the people in these positions, we must recognize that if we’re talking about “fake Christianity” that true Christianity, based 100% on what the Bible has to say about the issue, is probably more harsh on the subject of welfare than even the most radical conservatives.

Point for Conservatism.

Conservatism seems to be on the side of “true Christianity” on these first two points. We’ll take on two more issues next go ’round and see how the movement fairs. So far, however, Chuck isn’t looking very bright.

Beware the Obama

Written on February 14, 2008 – 12:30 am | Posted by Wes Comer |

There’s a lot of talk suddenly about the Democratic superdelegates issue with Obama sweeping into the lead. NPR reports on Donna Brazile’s position:

Democratic strategist Donna Brazile — who managed Al Gore’s 2000 presidential campaign and is herself a superdelegate — says she will quit her position within the Democratic Party if her superdelegate colleagues decide the party’s nomination.

“Let’s wait for some of these other states to help sort this out,” Brazile, a News & Notes contributor, told Farai Chideya.

And now Al Sharpton weighs in (imagine that) on seating delegates from Florida and Michigan:

“I write this letter as a former Democratic candidate for President of the United States and a civil rights leader who has fought his entire life for fairness and justice for all people regardless of the color of their skin. I firmly believe that changing the rules now, and seating delegates from Florida and Michigan at this point would not only violate the Democratic party’s rules of fairness, but also would be a grave injustice.”

He also adds, in a sentence that should probably get its own post, that he is “a civil rights leader who is neutral in this presidential primary season“.

But the question here isn’t why does Hillary want the delegates seated and the superdelegates for her — that much is obvious. The real question is why wouldn’t Obama want that? Let’s be honest here. What we’re talking about with this issue of Florida and Michigan is the public disenfranchisement of nearly 2.5 million Democratic voters. The DNC can talk about fairness and punishment all they want, but they’re not punishing the state parties responsible for the decision, they’re punishing the citizenry of those states that had absolutely no control over the process.

021308_vote.jpgWe’re talking about 180 delegates for Clinton. That’s the only reason Obama doesn’t want them seated. It has nothing to do with fairness and everyone knows it. If Clinton were smart, she would start pounding Sharpton, Brazile, and the entire DNC with their own quotes regarding disenfranchisement from the 2000 and 2004 elections. If the people of Florida and Michigan were smart, they would sue the DNC for blocking their vote. This would be useless, since there is no national right to vote (believe it or not), but would do such damage to the DNC as a party of the people that they would quickly settle the issue.

Frankly, Hillary Clinton, the Florida and Michigan voters, John McCain, and the rest of us shouldn’t be so afraid of being called racist that we allow ourselves to be bullied by hypocrites.

Two last points for all of you who are yelling “DON’T LET THEM BE SEATED! There was an AGREEMENT!” First, the agreement should have never been made — it isn’t right by any standard or for any reason to disenfranchise voters. Second, and final, you assume when you say that there was an agreement that you were privy to all the backroom discussion and dealing that goes with that type of arrangement. Who knows what winks and nods were exchanged. Frankly, if those states went for Obama this wouldn’t even be a discussion. They’d be calling him a hero for rescuing the disenfranchised, huddled masses.

I say beware a man who doesn’t blink at taping shut the mouths of 2.5 million.

Overwhelming Statistic

Written on February 12, 2008 – 8:27 pm | Posted by Wes Comer |

climatechange.JPG

 

For those of you who need a break from the election coverage, I bring you grave news from the global warming front — MSNBC.com reports that there’s a 50 percent chance that Lake Mead could go dry by 2021. That’s right. A 50% CHANCE.

That’s the exact same probability of earth being invaded by mutant squirrels from outer space, your being eaten alive by a cartoon wallaby, and Terry Frank leaving her husband for Michael Moore.

Be afraid.

Boo to Fox News…

Written on February 9, 2008 – 10:50 am | Posted by Wes Comer |

…who refused to carry Mike Huckabee’s full CPAC speech in favor of a fluff piece on bullying. I understand that he has a slim chance of winning the nomination at this point, but he certainly is still a big part of how things shape up for conservatives in the coming days. I still feel that it’s extremely important to hear what he has to say. Especially considering that they’ve carried every other speech in its entirety this week.

Boo. Hiss.

Dobson Endorses…

Written on February 8, 2008 – 10:14 am | Posted by Wes Comer |

020808_dobson.jpgMaybe I’ve just missed it. Maybe all the fanfare that normally goes along with an endorsement by a “Kingmaker” slipped past me. But I’m not seeing it anywhere. A cursory perusal of the major news sites has no headlining information (I found this information on WSJ and Fox Blogs) on Dr. James Dobson’s endorsement late last night of Gov. Mike Huckabee:

Dr. James Dobson issues the following statement tonight, speaking as a private citizen.”I am endorsing Gov. Mike Huckabee for President of the United States today. My decision comes in the wake of my statement on Super Tuesday that I could not vote for Sen. John McCain, even if he goes on to win the Republican nomination. His record on the institution of the family and other conservative issues makes his candidacy a matter of conscience and concern for me. That left two pro-family candidates whom I could support, but I was reluctant to choose between them. However, the decision by Gov. Mitt Romney to put his campaign “on hold” changes the political landscape. The remaining candidate for whom I could vote is Gov. Huckabee. His unwavering positions on the social issues, notably the institution of marriage, the importance of faith and the sanctity of human life, resonate deeply with me and with many others. That is why I will support Gov. Huckabee through the remaining primaries, and will vote for him in the general election if he should get the nomination. Obviously, the governor faces an uphill struggle, given the delegates already committed to Sen. McCain. Nevertheless, I believe he is our best remaining choice for President of the United States.

Is it too little too late? Probably. And this is what kills me about this. I mean, two weeks ago did anyone really see any different outcome? Not me, and I know that Dobson and others are far more intelligent than I on these matters. So why hold off on giving an endorsement that actually could have made a bigger difference if given before Super Tuesday?

At any rate, there it is. Dobson endorses Huckabee saying that if McCain receives the nomination that he will, for the first time in his life, not cast a vote for President.

Full Text of Romney’s CPAC Speech

Written on February 7, 2008 – 8:23 pm | Posted by Wes Comer |

020708_romney.jpg

Where was this version of Mitt Romney two months ago? Or even two days ago? He said more in this one speech to convince me to vote for him than every other appearance he’s ever made combined. Here, in its entirety is his speech from CPAC just a few hours ago:

“I want to begin by saying thank you. It’s great to be with you again. And I look forward to joining with you many more times in the future.

“Last year, CPAC gave me the sendoff I needed. I was in single digits in the polls, and I was facing household Republican names. As of today, more than 4 million people have given me their vote for President, less than Senator McCain’s 4.7 million, but quite a statement nonetheless. Eleven states have given me their nod, compared to his 13. Of course, because size does matter, he’s doing quite a bit better with his number of delegates.

“To all of you, thank you for caring enough about the future of America to show up, stand up and speak up for conservative principles.

“As I said to you last year, conservative principles are needed now more than ever. We face a new generation of challenges, challenges which threaten our prosperity, our security and our future. I am convinced that unless America changes course, we will become the France of the 21st century – still a great nation, but no longer the leader of the world, no longer the superpower. And to me, that is unthinkable. Simon Peres, in a visit to Boston, was asked what he thought about the war in Iraq. ‘First,’ he said, ‘I must put something in context. America is unique in the history of the world. In the history of the world, whenever there has been conflict, the nation that wins takes land from the nation that loses. One nation in history, and this during the last century, laid down hundreds of thousands of lives and took no land. No land from Germany, no land from Japan, no land from Korea. America is unique in the sacrifice it has made for liberty, for itself and for freedom loving people around the world.’ The best ally peace has ever known, and will ever know, is a strong America.

“And that is why we must rise to the occasion, as we have always done before, to confront the challenges ahead. Perhaps the most fundamental of these is the attack on the American culture.

“Over the years, my business has taken me to many countries. I have been struck by the enormous differences in the wealth and well-being of people of different nations. I have read a number of scholarly explanations for the disparities. I found the most convincing was that written by David Landes, a professor emeritus from Harvard University. I presume he’s a liberal – I guess that’s redundant. His work traces the coming and going of great civilizations throughout history. After hundreds of pages of analysis, he concludes with this:

“If we learn anything from the history of economic development, it is that culture makes all the difference. Culture makes all the difference.

“What is it about American culture that has led us to become the most powerful nation in the history of the world? We believe in hard work and education. We love opportunity: almost all of us are immigrants or descendants of immigrants who came here for opportunity – opportunity is in our DNA. Americans love God, and those who don’t have faith, typically believe in something greater than themselves – a ‘Purpose Driven Life.’ And we sacrifice everything we have, even our lives, for our families, our freedoms and our country. The values and beliefs of the free American people are the source of our nation’s strength and they always will be.

“The threat to our culture comes from within. The 1960’s welfare programs created a culture of poverty. Some think we won that battle when we reformed welfare, but the liberals haven’t given up. At every turn, they try to substitute government largesse for individual responsibility. They fight to strip work requirements from welfare, to put more people on Medicaid, and to remove more and more people from having to pay any income tax whatsoever. Dependency is death to initiative, risk-taking and opportunity. Dependency is a culture-killing drug. We have got to fight it like the poison it is.

“The attack on faith and religion is no less relentless. And tolerance for pornography – even celebration of it – and sexual promiscuity, combined with the twisted incentives of government welfare programs have led to today’s grim realities: 68% of African American children are born out-of-wedlock, 45% of Hispanic children, and 25% of White children. How much harder it is for these children to succeed in school and in life. A nation built on the principles of the Founding Fathers cannot long stand when its children are raised without fathers in the home.

“The development of a child is enhanced by having a mother and father. Such a family is the ideal for the future of the child and for the strength of a nation. I wonder how it is that unelected judges, like some in my state of Massachusetts, are so unaware of this reality, so oblivious to the millennia of recorded history. It is time for the people of America to fortify marriage through Constitutional amendment, so that liberal judges cannot continue to attack it.

“Europe is facing a demographic disaster. That is the inevitable product of weakened faith in the Creator, failed families, disrespect for the sanctity of human life and eroded morality. Some reason that culture is merely an accessory to America’s vitality; we know that it is the source of our strength. And we are not dissuaded by the snickers and knowing glances when we stand up for family values, and morality, and culture. We will always be honored to stand on principle and to stand for principle.

“The attack on our culture is not our sole challenge. We face economic competition unlike anything we have ever known before. China and Asia are emerging from centuries of poverty. Their people are plentiful, innovative and ambitious. If we do not change course, Asia or China will pass us by as the economic superpower, just as we passed England and France during the last century. The prosperity and security of our children and grandchildren depend on us.

“Our prosperity and security also depend on finally acting to become energy secure. Oil producing states like Russia and Venezuela, Saudi Arabia and Iran are siphoning over $400 billion per year from our economy – that’s almost what we spend annually for defense. It is past time for us to invest in energy technology, nuclear power, clean coal, liquid coal, renewable sources and energy efficiency. America must never be held hostage by the likes of Putin, Chavez, and Ahmadinejad.

“And our economy is also burdened by the inexorable ramping of government spending. Don’t focus on the pork alone – even though it is indeed irritating and shameful. Look at the entitlements. They make up 60% of federal spending today. By the end of the next President’s second term, they will total 70%. Any conservative plan for the future has to include entitlement reform that solves the problem, not just acknowledges it.

“Most politicians don’t seem to understand the connection between our ability to compete and our national wealth, and the wealth of our families. They act as if money just happens – that it’s just there. But every dollar represents a good or service produced in the private sector. Depress the private sector and you depress the well-being of Americans.

“That’s exactly what happens with high taxes, over-regulation, tort windfalls, mandates, and overfed, over-spending government. Did you see that today, government workers make more money than people who work in the private sector? Can you imagine what happens to an economy where the best opportunities are for bureaucrats?

“It’s high time to lower taxes, including corporate taxes, to take a weed-whacker to government regulations, to reform entitlements, and to stand up to the increasingly voracious appetite of the unions in our government.

“And finally, let’s consider the greatest challenge facing America – and facing the entire civilized world: the threat of violent, radical Jihad. In one wing of the world of Islam, there is a conviction that all governments should be destroyed and replaced by a religious caliphate. These Jihadists will battle any form of democracy. To them, democracy is blasphemous for it says that citizens, not God shape the law. They find the idea of human equality to be offensive. They hate everything we believe about freedom just as we hate everything they believe about radical Jihad.

“To battle this threat, we have sent the most courageous and brave soldiers in the world. But their numbers have been depleted by the Clinton years when troops were reduced by 500,000, when 80 ships were retired from the Navy, and when our human intelligence was slashed by 25%. We were told that we were getting a peace dividend. We got the dividend, but we didn’t get the peace. In the face of evil in radical Jihad and given the inevitable military ambitions of China, we must act to rebuild our military might – raise military spending to 4% of our GDP, purchase the most modern armament, re-shape our fighting forces for the asymmetric demands we now face, and give the veterans the care they deserve.

“Soon, the face of liberalism in America will have a new name. Whether it is Barack or Hillary, the result would be the same if they were to win the Presidency. The opponents of American culture would push the throttle, devising new justifications for judges to depart from the Constitution. Economic neophytes would layer heavier and heavier burdens on employers and families, slowing our economy and opening the way for foreign competition to further erode our lead.

“Even though we face an uphill fight, I know that many in this room are fully behind my campaign. You are with me all the way to the convention. Fight on, just like Ronald Reagan did in 1976. But there is an important difference from 1976: today, we are a nation at war.

“And Barack and Hillary have made their intentions clear regarding Iraq and the war on terror. They would retreat and declare defeat. And the consequence of that would be devastating. It would mean attacks on America, launched from safe havens that make Afghanistan under the Taliban look like child’s play. About this, I have no doubt.

“I disagree with Senator McCain on a number of issues, as you know. But I agree with him on doing whatever it takes to be successful in Iraq, on finding and executing Osama bin Laden, and on eliminating Al Qaeda and terror. If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.

“This is not an easy decision for me. I hate to lose. My family, my friends and our supporters – many of you right here in this room – have given a great deal to get me where I have a shot at becoming President. If this were only about me, I would go on. But I entered this race because I love America, and because I love America, I feel I must now stand aside, for our party and for our country.

“I will continue to stand for conservative principles. I will fight alongside you for all the things we believe in. And one of those things is that we cannot allow the next President of the United States to retreat in the face evil extremism.

“It is the common task of each generation – and the burden of liberty – to preserve this country, expand its freedoms and renew its spirit so that its noble past is prologue to its glorious future.

“To this task, accepting this burden, we are all dedicated, and I firmly believe, by the providence of the Almighty, that we will succeed beyond our fondest hope. America must remain, as it has always been, the hope of the Earth.

“Thank you, and God bless America.”

One Less Superdelegate

Written on February 7, 2008 – 8:10 pm | Posted by Wes Comer |

Mark Pazniokas:

Thanks to Zell Miller, there is a rule to deal with Joe Lieberman.

Lieberman’s endorsement of Republican John McCain disqualifies him as a super-delegate to the Democratic National Convention under what is informally known as the Zell Miller rule, according to Democratic State Chairwoman Nancy DiNardo.

Miller, then a Democratic senator from Georgia, not only endorsed Republican George Bush four years ago, but he delivered a vitriolic attack on Democrat John Kerry at the Republican National Convention.

The Democrats responded with a rule disqualifying any Democrat who crosses the aisle from being a super delegate. Lieberman will not be replaced, DiNardo said.

I voted for Huckabee. Here’s why you should, too.

Written on February 5, 2008 – 7:48 pm | Posted by Wes Comer |

I took the day off work yesterday, loaded up my family, and drove to Kingsport, TN for a Huckabee campaign stop at the Tri-Cities Airport. It was important to me because I wanted to see the man with my own eyes, hear his words for myself, and figure out where he’s coming from. I heard nothing that led me to believe that he was positioning himself as a Vice Presidential pick, and rather left that meeting inspired, and reinforced in my belief that this was the man that needs to be the next President of the United States.

He talked about tax reform in a way that is distinctly different from McCain. He talked about family values, something I haven’t heard out McCain’s mouth once. He spoke of the need to protect life, something that McCain has been hesitant to do. He even took a swipe or two at McCain, as well as Romney. He struck me as a man that wants to be President, and that he was sticking in the race for that purpose and none other.

The claims that Huckabee is running wingman for McCain are ridiculous.

Mike Huckabee is endorsed by the Tennessee Right to Life. This has been a pivotal endorsement for many conservative candidates in the past, yet it’s not receiving the attention it deserves. In fact, I believe that this reason is why, above all others, he is staying in this race. Is he a spoiler to Romney’s anti-McCain stance? Possibly, but we have to ask ourselves why. Is it because he’s a power hungry liberal? Or is it because he values life and recognizes that Romney only does so when it is politically expedient? I believe the latter.

Additionally, the fact that I’m hearing people who were once TN Right to Life endorsed candidates themselves now start to talk about Huckabee in the way they now are shows me that life is not a priority for them. I’ve marked their names and should they run again I’ll raise the issue. You can’t sell yourself with that endorsement, and then ignore it when it is applied to a fine candidate because of fear your support may help someone else. What a backwards way to think, and frankly, live.

One year ago on THIS DAY The Weekly Standard ran an article detailing Romney’s pro-abortion record. He stated in a 2002 survey that he supported Roe v. Wade, that Medicaid should pay for abortions, and increased access to the morning after pill. In a meeting with executives from NARAL he told them “You need someone like me in Washington.”

Mike Huckabee is the only candidate that has addressed IRS reform. Yes, Huckabbee supports the Fair Tax and that scares the pants off of some people. Fine. But I agree with him that our current tax system penalizes productivity and unfairly restricts and burdens small businesses with excessive taxes and maddening paperwork. He also is looking for ways to help the most poor among us with tax relief. All Republicans give taxes lip service, but can you tell me one detail from Romney or McCain’s tax plans? Me either. No one’s really heard them. Agree or disagree with Huckabee on this issue, at least it’s a topic of conversation on his radar.

Mike Huckabee stands for family values. In addition to what I mentioned above about life, Mike Huckabee is a supporter of a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman. While running for the Senate, Romney wrote a letter (PDF) to the Log Cabin Republicans talking about achieving the “values and vision of government we share” and throwing support behind gays in the military saying of the Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell policy, “I am also convinced that it is the first of a number of steps that will ultimately lead to gays and lesbians being allowed to serve openly and honestly in our nation’s military.”

These are powerful, substantive issues that deserve attention. I believe that Mike Huckabee offers an opportunity to advance in each of these areas and many others. I cannot, and will not, in good conscience support another candidate. There are those who ask about the General Election. They say a vote for Huckabee is a vote for McCain. Nonsense. A vote for Huckabee is a vote for Huckabee. I won’t sell out my values because of the specter of a Democratic president.

Unlike many other pundits out there, my values are not for sale.

In 1998 Republicans assailed the public majority who were against a Clinton impeachment on perjury charges. Many people felt that because the economy was strong that they should ignore his personal moral shortcomings. At the time Republicans were adamant that there was more to being a President than fiscal policy. Today those same Republicans are saying we should vote for Romney because of strength on the economy, and ignore his failures in leading on social issues that should be near and dear to true conservatives.

So yes, Huckabee has fiscal shortcomings. Yes, if his staying in leads to a McCain nomination it could mean a loss for the GOP. But I would rather sell out this election than sell out my morals and the heart and soul of the party. I will not vote for Mitt Romney. Ever. I will not vote for McCain. I voted for Mike Huckabee and I hope that I’ve given you some reasons here to do the same thing.

UPDATE: I forgot to mention that Mike Huckabee is also the only remaining candidate, on either side, that opposes the Real ID Act.

Give Me a Break

Written on January 25, 2008 – 9:39 am | Posted by Wes Comer |

There’s a big stink going on over Hillary Clinton and her association with Rezko, a “slum lord”, after she slammed Obama for it:

rezko.jpg

With all the substantive stuff we have on Hillary Clinton, is this really going to be our focus? I mean Fox News is crawling all over this in a manner that is, frankly, embarrassing. I mean, come on. And if you make a big stink about this, what about those photos of President Bush and Jack Abramoff?

bush-and-abramoff.JPG

Let’s focus on the areas we can beat Hillary rather than make ourselves look petty and desperate. If we make this the first thing we throw up, then we stand at risk of making real issues appear lesser, and by association, petty as well.

Exercise in Failure Comes to End

Written on January 22, 2008 – 4:29 pm | Posted by Wes Comer |

070707_fredthompson.jpg

Fred Thompson has ended his bid for the Republican nomination. I like Fred. I could have voted for Fred. Fred’s a nice guy.

I’m glad he’s gone.

I have no sympathy for a man who started with such a powerful ground swelling of grass-roots supporters and ended up falling asleep at the wheel. Think about it. He wasn’t even planning on running, but then people begin to clamor, literally, for him to run. They’re making signs and bumper stickers. People are wearing “Run, Fred, Run!” shirts and when he announces you can hear from space the screams of the millions that he excited.

And then he died.

Or…something. Something happened that leaves me, to this moment, mouth agape at how stupid you have to be to blow that kind of support. His arrogant “I’ll do it how I want to do it” mentality didn’t lend itself very well to fund raising and raising general “likability”. Before he ran people thought of him as a strong father/grandfather type. Exactly who they were looking for. Once he announced he was more like the cranky guy in front of you at the supermarket who’s afraid you’re going to cut line and keep him from getting his prune juice fix.

What a waste. Fact of the matter is that he was our best shot at a balanced conservative. Too bad he squandered his good fortune by wearing his Depends too tight and being, generally, a grumpy old cuss.

What particularly bothers me is that he not only waited to get out when he should have been out weeks ago, but that he also managed to clear the way for McCain to take South Carolina. If not for his constant Huckabee attacks, the Governor would have taken S.C. and we would have seen the McCain machine suffer the effects. Instead, grumpy old Fred thought he would stick it out, with no evidence to support his claim that he felt he could win, and he very well may have sealed the Republican Party’s fate to run a 72 year old, Washington insider, liberal in sheep’s clothing candidate against the fetal St. Obama and/or the Clinton Menace.

I could go on. Bottom line — I’m glad he’s gone.

Let the cannibalizing that defines the “conservative” blogosphere commence.

Worm in the Apple

Written on January 15, 2008 – 3:02 pm | Posted by Wes Comer |

I love Apple products. They just work, and that’s awesome to me. Steve Jobs just wrapped up his keynote address from MacWorld 2008 where he introduced a whole new slew of products including iTunes movie rentals, Apple TV v2, iPhone upgrades, and the world’s thinnest laptop (3/4″ at its thickest point, just over 1/4″ at its thinnest).

So who’s the worm? Randy Newman was this year’s closing entertainment. He joked about writing a song for Toy Story (he’s Pixar’s go-to-guy for cute kiddie music) for a love scene between Buzz and Woody before comparing America and President Bush to Hitler and Stalin, cursing about the fact that the Supreme Court would outlive him, and general going bat guano on the United States.

Yikes, Apple. Be careful not to offend all those fine, hardworking Americans that are buying your products.

East Tennessee Snow

Written on January 15, 2008 – 2:13 pm | Posted by Wes Comer |

They’re calling for 2″ tonight. That means there’s no longer any bread or milk in a 150 mile radius, and area schools have been closed until March. See you when I dig out…

About this site

This is the personal blog of Wes Comer, a graphic designer, youth pastor, and husband of one, father of three. Here I'll share my thoughts and opinions, weighed against Truth that will hopefully help shape your world view. Most articles on this site are related to national politics, Tennessee state politics, and religion. More

Want to subscribe?

 Subscribe in a reader Or, subscribe via email:
Enter your email address:  
Find entries :